A serious economic problem…
2 millions tourists, you say? Well, most of you would say that this situation will boost our economy and who knows, maybe give us a better perception of life in Mauritius.
Our little paradise island is now depending more on the tertiary sector rather than the primary and the secondary ones. Our canes are being cut down to accomodate more buildings. The Cybercity at Ebène is one concrete example, though it was on of the places which produced a lot. You guys already know the problems we are having with our sugar export, so I don’t think I need to elaborate more on this.Tea was never an option here nor were other products either.
When we would talk of the secondary sector, we would surely think of a once thriving textile industry but even that is lost. We surely cannot compete with the Chinese, who are in a way dominating the world. Though they do have a language problem, they are actually trying to make sure that at least in the capital, everyone is fluent in English. When aiming for development , a country makes it way towards other countries and language is the key to this. But what we are seeing nowadays is completely the opposite. Rather than China aiming to have an English speaking population, it’s the rest of the world leaning Mandarin.
Let’s get back to the main subject here. Mauritius can certainly not accommodate 2 millions tourist. It’s IMPOSSIBLE. Face the reality man, ’cause we don’t have enough space. Even the clearing of all agricultural land and forests would not allow this. Besides, tourists mainly prefer to stay by the seaside rather in town, which could really be a problem as most coast land IS already occupied. After all, they come for our sun, sand and sea.
Moreover, more tourists can certainly mean prices would rise. Tourists for us mean richer people with a lot to spend. Most people would have the tendency to raise prices for a better revenue. More tourist and higher prices, more money. Logical ain’t it? But what about the local people? Though more jobs would be created, having prices going up all of a sudden with certainly cause some families to drown in what we call poverty.
Well, dear readers, that’s not all. Tourists come here for holiday and as I’ve said before, for our sun, sand and sea. But what’s the use of having a holiday with a beach crammed with people. it is mainly during summer that there’s a concentration of tourists on our beaches. So, these 2 millions would be most likely to come from mid October to mid April. Inner peace, that’s what they are looking for but could we offer them that with all the beaches full with people? Can you relax in a crowd? If you can’t, then how could they? After all, they are humans, just like us.
We should also, not forget that with the crime rate increasing, our island is really vulnerable in terms of security. We’re incompetent in this field, you have to admit it. Could we really ensure their security when we can surely not ensure ours? There’s nothing more painful than people returning home from a holiday with rapes or thefts as luggage.
With all these, could Mauritius really keep the title of “Paradise Island”? I do wonder sometimes…
P.S. I got the idea of writing about this while reading an article in l’express dimanche

For me its a good thing! i don’t have a Phd in economics but i think this can help to at least stop stop this damn shit of RUPEE depreciate!
chervine said this on October 8, 2007 at 11:50 am
This was a really good read Nussaibah! You have some great points here that we often disregard when considering tourism. The space problem is never taken into consideration. Some regions like Grand Bay feels foreign to mauritians because they are so crowded with tourists. :S
morinn said this on October 8, 2007 at 12:01 pm
@ chervine, there are other ways to do this you know…
bbZuSh said this on October 8, 2007 at 6:43 pm
Good post. I would like to visit, but would likely do so on off season. Living where I do, people flock for warm vacations during your peak time, because we have snow on the ground. As a person going on vacation, I think that people are drawn to the weather and the beach, whether crowded or not. As for relaxing, a change is a good as a rest, so if I went somewhere different, and left my cares behind, it would be a rest despite the hoards of people. I don’t like crowds thus going in off season (as well as cost). I think people are becoming more worried about crime in their travels, and I know people who are too afraid to go to Mexico, because of recent crimes to tourists, as well as the way the police handle it. I have a fear of going to Miami for the same reason. I have not travelled in the last 20 years since going to Hawaii, NewZealand and Australia before I was married, but one day I hope to go some place again.
Dawn said this on October 8, 2007 at 10:13 pm
Like everything, the tourism industry too have advantages as well as disadvantages. But if the government regulates the industry well, it will be able to develop the industry in a sustainable way. But the problem here is that the government take actions only when the situation becomes critical.
As far as I know, the 2 millions tourists objective is for the year 2015. You’re right about the implications of it. Me too I don’t think that 2 millions is the optimum size for our island. This will definitely cause over exploitation of our natural resources.
I only hope that the government will be regulating this industry well :S
koonul said this on October 9, 2007 at 7:42 pm
Well, 2 million tourists is going overboard. Are these people who set up that goal actually aware of the island’s situations? Even government tourism planners say this target is unfeasible! 2 million tourists would just leech off our resources and yeah, as you said, our island cannot sustain that number of tourists, in terms of space and facilities. I understand the country has to maintain his development and that now that our sugar industry and textile industry are declining, we are relying more on tourism. But still that target of 2 million is too unrealistic. The tourism sector should expand, i agree, but moderately!
sayuka said this on October 9, 2007 at 10:27 pm
@ sayuka
Hehe, I didn’t want to mention this but actually, when I read this article, I thought of the guy who told us this.
@ Koonul
well, I do hope they do so :S
@ Dawn
If you have to come here. please don’t come during summer :S Certainly not December till March, you may have to face cyclones
bbZuSh said this on October 9, 2007 at 10:31 pm
Hei Nus
So very interesting and intriguing article about your country. Lots of logistical et al problems…
Do you know that also Ireland gets more tourists per year than the total population is?!!
lol
Used to think that the whole island will sink with all the weight of these people…
Take care and do keep so well. Rii : )
Riihele said this on October 9, 2007 at 11:32 pm
I think Dawn is right. A countries’ Crime Rate is a dominant factor that affects the travellers’ choice as to their holiday destination. I would certainly avoid visiting a risky country. I know that Zimbabwe, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Sudan, Chechnya (Russia), Somalia, Congo, Haiti, Iraq and Afganistan are the most extremely dangerous places to go. Even South Africa is a very poor choice. However, I heard about Seychelles. They say its a safe and also very interesting island to visit but it’s very expensive. The good news is that most of the travel agencies over here provide up to date info as well as useful advice on almost any destination around the world. For instance, I have not yet decided where to go this year. My agent told me that Mexico, Argentina and Mauritius are all very safe places to visit.
JD Easton said this on November 6, 2007 at 10:52 am